![]() The Grid code is much simpler and cleaner. Items can be aligned in your container or between them. The Flexible Box Layout Module, makes it easier to design flexible responsive layout structure without using float or positioning. Positioned, for explicit position of an element. We could build this with either Grid or flexbox. Pros: Flex can be arranged in any direction Flex can have its visual order reversed or rearranged. Before the Flexbox Layout module, there were four layout modes: Block, for sections in a webpage. We have a grid of nine items of equal width placed from left to right in rows of three, and a 20px gap between each item. With Grid you have tracks (rows and columns), cells, and grid areas (a group of more than one cell) and items must be placed in these cells or Grid areas. That doesn’t make Grid a better choice for everything though. Grid is often the right choice when you need to control the layout in two dimensions. See the Pen CSS Grid components with variables and media queries by Michelle on CodePen. Once you have a flex container, you can then apply the various flex properties to its children. This establishes a new flex formatting context for its contents. I’ve often opted to use Grid when I need to prescisely control the size and placement for items in one dimension like in this demo and accompanying article: First, you declare the flex container by applying display: flex or display: inline-flex to it. A flexbox layout consists of two elements: The flex container (or flex parent): This is the top-level or parent element. Elements in a flexbox layout can have their height or width set to accommodate different screen sizes. Again, that doesn’t mean you should never use grid for one-dimensional layouts. Flexbox was developed to make it easier to align content using one-dimensional layouts, either vertically or horizontally. flex-end : Items align to the right side of the container. One dimension or two?Ī big difference between Grid and flexbox is that Grid allows us to control the placement of items in two dimensions (rows and columns), where flexbox does not. Flexbox Froggy flex-start : Items align to the left side of the container. ![]() Likewise, there are cases for using flexbox where you do need calc(), so this can only be interpreted as a guideline. One example might be a fixed-width, two-dimensional layout, where each track is 200px wide - you don’t need calc() to tell you how wide those tracks should be, but you might still want the behaviour of Grid. But now what Should you build your apps main container layout using Grid or Flexbox Honestly you could pull it off with either. There are cases when you might need Grid, even though your layout doesn’t require calc(). While that’s fine as a general principle, it’s not the whole picture. Often, if you’re having to use calc() a lot to get precise track sizes (factoring in gutters, for example) then it’s worth considering using Grid, as the fr unit will do the heavy lifting for you and save you any number of headaches. If it looks like I’d need to reach for calc() a lot for layout then that’s usually a good sign of when I need Grid over flexbox- Michelle Barker January 26, 2019 My own contribution to the thread was this: Here are some of the questions you could ask yourself when it comes to choosing a layout method. ![]() The main piece of advice I would give is to take every design individually, analyse the options available and don’t make assumptions about which technology you need. If you take this as a rule, then you’re severely limiting yourself when it comes to Grid’s power. What surprised me about reading the responses in the thread was the number of people stating that they would only use Grid for page-level layout, and flexbox for everything else. In this article I want to unpack when and where you might want to use Grid or flexbox, and some reasons for choosing one or the other. Alternatively, you can apply Flexbox and CSS Grid to an element and, if a broswer supports one but not the other then the. For instance I can place a div in a CSS-Grid parent container (which has display:grid) but the child div could have display:flex to lay out it’s children. However, reading tweets individually doesn’t tell the whole story. You can use them together but not necessarily one the same element. Flexbox isn’t for most of the things we’ve been using it for.- Jen Simmons January 26, 2019 Not only in the second dimension (which is easiest to talk about), but also in the first dimension. Content will line up from one to the other, as you ask it to. Rows AND columns.- Rachel Andrew January 25, 2019 Naturally some of the most insightful replies came from Rachel Andrew and Jen Simmons:įlexbox is for one dimensional layout. A recent Twitter thread started by Chris Coyier got me thinking about how people in general interpret the use cases for CSS Grid Layout versus flexbox:įor y'all that have an understand of both CSS grid and flexbox, what's your favorite way of explaining the difference?- Chris Coyier January 25, 2019 CSS Grid Beats Flexbox for Full Page LayoutĪhh that sweet moment when you and your new app have your first style together.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |